Content Options

View Options

chargeable case

    any complaint 73 226 referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service, except where:

      1. (a) the Ombudsman considers it apparent from the73226 complaint 73 226 , when it is received, and from any final response, summary resolution communication 234 or redress determination119229 which has been issued by the firm or licensee224, that the73226 complaint 73 226 should not proceed because:
        1. (i) the complainant is not an eligible complainant in accordance with DISP 2; or
        1. (ii) the73226 complaint 73 226 does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service (as described in DISP 2); or
        1. (iii) the Ombudsman considers that the73226 complaint 73 226 should be dismissed without consideration of its merits under 176231DISP 3.3.4 R or DISP 3.3.4A R (2)to (5) 176231(Dismissal of complaints without consideration of the merits73226176231); or
      1. (b) the Ombudsman considers, at any stage, that the73226 complaint 73 226 should be dismissed under73226 DISP 3.3.4 R (2) 73 226 or DISP 3.3.4A R (1)176231 on the grounds that it is frivolous or 3113176231vexatious; or176231
      1. (c) the Ombudsman considers it apparent from the complaint when it is received, and from any redress determination which has been issued by the respondent, that the respondent has reviewed the subject matter of the complaint and issued a redress determination in accordance with the terms of a consumer redress scheme, unless the complainant and the respondent agree that the complaint should not be dealt with by the Ombudsman in accordance with the consumer redress scheme.176231233