Status: You are viewing the version of the handbook as on 2018-04-01.

chargeable case

    any complaint 73 241 referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service, except where:

      1. (a) the Ombudsman considers it apparent from the73241 complaint 73 241 , when it is received, and from any final response, summary resolution communication 249 or redress determination119244 which has been issued by the firm or licensee239, that the73241 complaint 73 241 should not proceed because:
        1. (i) the complainant is not an eligible complainant in accordance with DISP 2; or
        1. (ii) the73241 complaint 73 241 does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service (as described in DISP 2); or
        1. (iii) the Ombudsman considers that the73241 complaint 73 241 should be dismissed without consideration of its merits under 176246DISP 3.3.4 R or DISP 3.3.4A R (2)to (5) 176246(Dismissal of complaints without consideration of the merits73241176246); or
      1. (b) the Ombudsman considers, at any stage, that the73241 complaint 73 241 should be dismissed under73241 DISP 3.3.4 R (2) 73 241 or DISP 3.3.4A R (1)176246 on the grounds that it is frivolous or 3113176246vexatious; or176246
      1. (c) the Ombudsman considers it apparent from the complaint when it is received, and from any redress determination which has been issued by the respondent, that the respondent has reviewed the subject matter of the complaint and issued a redress determination in accordance with the terms of a consumer redress scheme, unless the complainant and the respondent agree that the complaint should not be dealt with by the Ombudsman in accordance with the consumer redress scheme.176246248