Content Options

View Options

chargeable case

    any complaint 73 242 referred to the Financial Ombudsman Service, except where:

      1. (a) the Ombudsman considers it apparent from the73242 complaint 73 242 , when it is received, and from any final response, summary resolution communication 250 or redress determination119245 which has been issued by the firm or licensee240, that the73242 complaint 73 242 should not proceed because:
        1. (i) the complainant is not an eligible complainant in accordance with DISP 2; or
        1. (ii) the73242 complaint 73 242 does not fall within the jurisdiction of the Financial Ombudsman Service (as described in DISP 2); or
        1. (iii) the Ombudsman considers that the73242 complaint 73 242 should be dismissed without consideration of its merits under 176247DISP 3.3.4 R or DISP 3.3.4A R (2)to (5) 176247(Dismissal of complaints without consideration of the merits73242176247); or
      1. (b) the Ombudsman considers, at any stage, that the73242 complaint 73 242 should be dismissed under73242 DISP 3.3.4 R (2) 73 242 or DISP 3.3.4A R (1)176247 on the grounds that it is frivolous or 3113176247vexatious; or176247
      1. (c) the Ombudsman considers it apparent from the complaint when it is received, and from any redress determination which has been issued by the respondent, that the respondent has reviewed the subject matter of the complaint and issued a redress determination in accordance with the terms of a consumer redress scheme, unless the complainant and the respondent agree that the complaint should not be dealt with by the Ombudsman in accordance with the consumer redress scheme.176247249