Where a firm has given an undertaking or a court has ruled the firm's term unfair, then the FCA considers it desirable that the firm should promptly notify clients with whom it has already concluded contracts of the effect the undertaking or ruling will have on their contracts.
The firm should also, as part of its risk management, consider the effect on its own business, including whether there are relevant risks which need mitigation. For example, firms should consider the effect of section 62 of the CRA2 which provides that an unfair term or consumer notice2is not binding on the consumer.2
Section 67 of the CRA provides that where a term of a consumer contract is not binding on the consumer, the contract continues, so far as practicable, to have effect in every other respect. Mitigation may involve the firm contacting existing customers to ask that they agree to an amended contract, although any such amendment will itself need to avoid unfairness within the meaning of the CRA and to comply with the law of contract generally.21
As part of their risk management, firms that have not given an undertaking or been subject to a court decision should remain alert to undertakings or court decisions about other firms, since these will be of potential value in indicating the likely attitude of the courts, the FCA, the CMA or other qualifying bodies to similar terms or notices or those intended to have similar effects.2
Status: Please note you should read all Brexit changes to the FCA Handbook and BTS alongside the main FCA transitional directions. Where these directions apply the 'standstill', firms have the choice between complying with the pre-IP completion day rules, or the post-IP completion day rules. To see a full list of Handbook modules affected, please see Annex B to the main FCA transitional directions.