SYSC 2.1.3 R to SYSC 2.2.3 G apply, but only in relation to allocation of the function in SYSC 2.1.3 R (2) and only in so far as responsibility for the matter in question is not reserved by a European Community instrument to the firm's Home State regulator; and
- (3) 6
for a UCITS qualifier:
- (5) 810
- (6) 810
- (1) 10
- (3) 76
in relation to the following regulated activities:
business relating to contracts which are within the Regulated Activities Order only because they fall within paragraph (e) of the definition of "contract of insurance" in article 3 of that Order;
- (ii) 7
SYSC 1.1.5 R (2) does not mean that inadequacy of a group member's systems and controls will automatically lead to a firm contravening, for example, SYSC 3.1.1 R. Rather, the potential impact of a group member's activities, including its systems and controls, and any systems and controls that operate on a group basis, will be relevant in determining the appropriateness of the firm's own systems and controls.
SYSC 2 and SYSC 3 apply with respect to activities carried on from an establishment maintained by the firm (or its appointed representative or, where applicable, its tied agent) in the United Kingdom unless another applicable rule which is relevant to the activity has a wider territorial scope, in which case SYSC 2 and SYSC 3 apply with that wider scope in relation to the activity described in that rule.110
An example of the type of rule referred to in SYSC 1.1.7 R with a different territorial scope is the custody rules in the non-directive custody chapter9. These rules apply9, for certain UK firms, to activities carried on from branches in other EEA States as well as UK establishments (CASS 1.3.3 R (General application where?)). Therefore SYSC 2 and SYSC 3 apply to the custody activities described in the non-directive custody chapter9 carried on from such a branch by such a UK firm. The UK firm must, for example, take reasonable care to establish systems and controls under SYSC 3.1.1 R as are appropriate to those activities carried on from its EEA branches as well as from its UK establishments.1999
In considering whether to take regulatory action under SYSC 2 or SYSC 3 in relation to activities carried on outside the United Kingdom, the FSA will take into account the standards expected in the market in which the firm is operating.1
Most of the rules in SYSC 3 are linked to other requirements and standards under the regulatory system which have their own territorial limitations so that those SYSC rules are similarly limited in scope.