the precise circumstances of the individual case;
the characteristics of the particular function performed by the individual in question; and
the behaviour expected in that function.
whether they exercised reasonable care when considering the information available to them;
whether they reached a reasonable conclusion upon which to act;
the nature, scale and complexity of the firm's business;
their role and responsibility as determined by reference to the relevant statement of responsibility;
the knowledge they had, or should have had, of regulatory concerns, if any, relating to their role and responsibilities.
In assessing whether a senior conduct rules staff member may have breached a rule in COCON, the nature, scale and complexity of the business and the role and responsibility of the individual undertaking the activity in question within the firm will be relevant in assessing whether that person's conduct was reasonable. For example, the smaller and less complex the business, the less detailed and extensive the systems of control need to be.
UK domestic firms with a premium listing1 are subject to the UK Corporate Governance Code, whose internal control Provisions1 are explained in the publication entitled ‘Guidance on Risk Management, Internal Control and Related Financial and Business Reporting (September 2014)’1 issued by the Financial Reporting Council. Therefore, firms in this category will be subject to that code, as well as to the rules in COCON. In forming an opinion as to whether a senior conduct rules staff member has complied with the rules in COCON, the FCA will give due credit if they followed corresponding Provisions1 in the UK Corporate Governance Code and related guidance.