only consists of execution or reception and transmission of client orders, with or without ancillary services, excluding ancillary service (2) in section B of Annex I to MiFID (granting of credits or loans), where the relevant credits or loans do not comprise existing credit limits of loans, current accounts and overdraft facilities of clients;
the client has been clearly informed (whether in a standardised format or not) that, in the provision of the2 service or insurance distribution activity2, the firm is not required to assess the appropriateness of the financial instrument or service or insurance-based investment product2 provided or offered and that therefore the client does not benefit from the protection of the rules on assessing appropriateness; and
the firm complies with its obligations in relation to conflicts of interest.
The financial instruments referred to in (1)(a)(ii) are any of the following:
shares in companies admitted to trading on:
an equivalent third country market; or
bonds or other forms of securitised debt admitted to trading on:
an equivalent third country market; or
except those that embed a derivative or incorporate a structure which makes it difficult for the client to understand the risk involved; or
other non-complex financial instruments.
For the purposes of this rule, a third country market is considered to be equivalent to a regulated market if it is a market in relation to which the Treasury has4 adopted an affirmative equivalence decision in accordance with the requirements and procedure1 in paragraph 8 of Part 1 of Schedule 3 to MiFIR4..11
[Note: ESMA 3 has published guidelines which specify criteria for the assessment of (i) debt instruments incorporating a structure which makes it difficult for the client to understand the risk involved, and (ii) structured deposits incorporating a structure which makes it difficult for the client to understand the risk of return or the cost of exiting the product before term (see ESMA/2015/1787 (EN), 4 February 2016)4.]
3[Note: EIOPA has published guidelines under the IDD which specify criteria for the assessment of insurance-based investment products that incorporate a structure which makes it difficult for the customer to understand the risk involved (see EIOPA-17/651, 4 October 2017)4.]
457 A financial instrument which is not explicitly specified in [COBS 10A.4.1R(2)] shall be considered as non-complex for the purposes of paragraph (2)(f) of that rule if it satisfies the following criteria:
(a) it does not fall within Article 2(1)(24)(c) of Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 or paragraphs 4 to 11 of Part 1 of Schedule 2 to the Regulated Activities Order;
(b) there are frequent opportunities to dispose of, redeem, or otherwise realise that instrument at prices that are publicly available to market participants and that are either market prices or prices made available, or validated, by valuation systems independent of the issuer;
(c) it does not involve any actual or potential liability for the client that exceeds the cost of acquiring the instrument;
(d) it does not incorporate a clause, condition or trigger that could fundamentally alter the nature or risk of the investment or pay out profile, such as investments that incorporate a right to convert the instrument into a different investment;
(e) it does not include any explicit or implicit exit charges that have the effect of making the investment illiquid even though there are technically frequent opportunities to dispose of, redeem or otherwise realise it;
(f) adequately comprehensive information on its characteristics is publicly available and is likely to be readily understood so as to enable the average retail client to make an informed judgment as to whether to enter into a transaction in that instrument.
[Note: article 57 of the MiFID Org Regulation]
(a) it includes a contractually guaranteed minimum maturity value which is at least the amount paid by the customer after deduction of legitimate costs;
(b) it does not incorporate a clause, condition or trigger that allows the insurance undertaking to materially alter the nature, risk, or pay-out profile of the insurance-based investment product;
(c) it provides options to surrender or otherwise realise the insurance-based investment product at a value that is available to the customer;
(d) it does not include any explicit or implicit charges which have the effect that, even though there are technically options to surrender or otherwise realise the insurance-based investment product, doing so may cause unreasonable detriment to the customer because the charges are disproportionate to the cost to the insurance undertaking;
(e) it does not in any other way incorporate a structure which makes it difficult for the customer to understand the risks involved.
[Note: article 16 of the IDD Regulation]