The FSA will acknowledge a complaint within five business days of receipt and will deal with it in accordance with COAF 2.4.2 G-COAF 2.4.4 G. Where the complaint is in a durable medium, the FSA will send each complainant a leaflet, in a durable medium, explaining how the transitional complaints scheme works, including details of his right to refer the complaint to the Complaints Commissioner if he is dissatisfied with the way in which the FSA has dealt with it (see COAF 2.4.6 G).1
1Where the FSA does not investigate a complaint under the transitional complaints scheme , either because the FSA considers it to be outside of the scope of the complaints scheme or for another reason described in COAF (see COAF 2.2 (Application) and COAF 2.3 (Coverage and scope of the scheme)), the FSA will write to the complainant explaining why this is the case and informing him of his right to ask the Complaints Commissioner to review the decision. The FSA will do this within four weeks of receiving the complaint.
1A complaint made orally by a consumer will be investigated by the FSA. However, if the FSA requires further clarification from the complainant as to the nature or scope of the complaint, the FSA may either invite the complainant to confirm or clarify the details of the complaint, or it may communicate its understanding of the nature or scope of the complaint to the consumer, in a durable medium.
The FSA may not be able to progress its investigation of a complaint until it has received the information described in (1) to (3), as it needs to understand from the complainant what the complaint is about if it is to investigate it properly.
The FSA will arrange for an initial investigation by its own staff of any complaint which is a complaint under the terms of the transitional complaints scheme and which does not come within the provisions of COAF 2.3.1 G to COAF 2.3.6 G. That investigation will be carried out by a suitably senior member of staff who has not previously been involved in the matter complained of, with a view to resolving the matter to the complainant's satisfaction.1
The FSA will seek to resolve the complaint as quickly as possible. The FSA will either complete the investigation of a complaint within four weeks, or it will write to the complainant within this time setting out a reasonable timescale within which it plans to deal with the complaint. If the FSA has not already confirmed whether or not the complaint will be admitted to the complaints scheme, the FSA will include this information.1
Remedying a well-founded complaint may include offering the complainant an apology and taking steps to rectify an error. If the FSA decides not to uphold a complaint, it will give its reasons for doing so to the complainant, and will inform the complainant of his right to ask the Complaints Commissioner to review the FSA's decision.1
When the FSA has told a complainant in writing that it will investigate his complaint, as provided for by COAF 2.4.1B G, it will also notify the Complaints Commissioner of this fact. The Complaints Commissioner will not review the FSA's decision unless the complainant requests this. Where the complainant does request this, the Commissioner will, after considering any representations from the complainant and the FSA, then decide whether the complaint falls within the scope of the transitional complaints scheme and, if so, whether to conduct an investigation.1
If a complaint is referred or notified to the Complaints Commissioner before the FSA has had the opportunity to conduct or complete an investigation, the Complaints Commissioner will consider whether it would be desirable to allow the FSA that opportunity before conducting his own investigation;1
The Complaints Commissioner may conduct an investigation in whatever manner he thinks appropriate including obtaining, at the FSA's expense, such external resources as may be reasonable. In considering what is appropriate, the Complaints Commissioner will take into account the need to ensure that complaints are dealt with fairly, quickly and cost effectively.1
The FSA will afford the Complaints Commissioner all reasonable co-operation including giving access to its staff and information. The FSA may, in affording the Complaints Commissioner access to information, have regard to the need to maintain the confidentiality of certain kinds of information. This would include, for example, taking appropriate steps to ensure that the identity of an informant is not disclosed or maintaining the confidentiality of information given to the FSA under international arrangements. In any case where the FSA decides that it should withhold information it will inform the Complaints Commissioner of the nature of that information and its reasons for withholding it.
The Complaints Commissioner will ensure that, before he concludes an investigation and makes a report, any person who may be the subject of criticism in it is given notice of, and the opportunity to respond to, that criticism.
a court of competent jurisdiction (whether in the United Kingdom or elsewhere); or
the Financial Services Tribunal; or
any other tribunal established by legislative authority (whether in the United Kingdom or elsewhere); or
which has not been set aside on appeal or otherwise, shall be conclusive evidence of the facts so found and any decision of that court or tribunal shall be conclusive.
The Complaints Commissioner will ensure that his report, apart from identifying the FSA, PIA, IMRO or SFA, does not mention the name of any other person or contain particulars which are likely to identify any other person unless:
in the opinion of the Complaints Commissioner the omission of such particulars would be likely to impair the effectiveness of the report; or
after taking into account the public interest, as well as the interests of the complainant, and the interests of other persons, the Complaints Commissioner considers it necessary to mention the name of that person or to include in the report those particulars (see also COAF 2.4.14 G).
The Complaints Commissioner may publish his report (or any part of it) if he considers that the report (or any part of it) ought to be brought to the attention of the public.